An Assessment of Pediatric Primary Care Providers' and Parents' Dental Health Knowledge and Practices.

INTRODUCTION: One in five children aged < 5 years has experienced caries, making it the most prevalent chronic disease in childhood. The failure to address a child's dental health can lead to short-term and long-term complications and problems with permanent dentition. Primary care pediatric providers are in the position to participate in the prevention of caries because of the frequency they see young children before establishing a dental home. METHOD: A retrospective chart review and two surveys were developed to collect data from health care providers and parents of children aged < 6 years about their dental health knowledge and practices. RESULTS: While providers report being comfortable discussing dental health with patients, review of medical records shows inconsistent discussion and documentation of dental health. DISCUSSION: There appears to be a lack of education regarding dental health among parents and health care providers. Primary care providers are not effectively communicating the importance of childhood dental health and are not routinely documenting dental health information.

Money, Managed Care, and Medicaid Initiatives Matter: Patient-centered Medical Home Capacity in School-based Health Centers.

School-based health centers (SBHCs) have been suggested as potential medical homes, but may experience challenges implementing the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model. It is currently unknown if there are PCMH variations among different types of SBHCs. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between SBHC characteristics and PCMH capacity. Using 2013-2014 National Census of School-Based Health Centers data, SBHC PCMH Index scores were calculated and used as outcomes in linear regression models examining associations between PCMH capacity and SBHC characteristics. The mean PCMH capacity score for all SBHCs was 68.59%, with higher scores in the Comprehensive Care domain than in the Care Quality domain. Managed care arrangements, Medicaid PCMH initiatives, more funding sources, and higher patient billing activity were all positively associated with overall PCMH capacity. Having higher percentages of students who are members of racial/ethnic minority groups was negatively associated with overall PCMH capacity.

Systematic Review of Community Paramedicine and EMS Mobile Integrated Health Care Interventions in the United States.

Emergency medical services (EMS) in the United States are frequently used for nonurgent medical needs. Use of 911 and the emergency department (ED) for primary care-treatable conditions is expensive, inefficient, and undesirable for patients and providers. The objective is to describe the outcomes from community paramedicine (CP) and mobile integrated health care (MIH) interventions related to the Quadruple Aim. Three electronic databases were searched for peer-review literature on CP-MIH interventions in the United States. Eight articles reporting data from 7 interventions were included. Four studies reported high levels of patient satisfaction, and only 3 measured health outcomes. No study reported provider satisfaction measures. Reducing ED and inpatient utilization were the most common study outcomes, and programs generally were successful at reducing utilization. With reduced utilization, costs should be reduced; however, most studies did not quantify savings. Future studies should conduct economic analyses that not only compare the intervention to traditional EMS services, but also measure potential cost savings to the EMS agencies running the intervention. Most cost savings from reduced utilization will be to insurance companies and patients, but more efficient use of EMS agencies' resources could lead to cost savings that could offset intervention implementation costs. The other 3 aims (health, patient satisfaction, and provider satisfaction) were reported inconsistently in these studies and need to be addressed further. Given the small number of heterogeneous studies reviewed, the potential for CP-MIH interventions to comprehensively address the Quadruple Aim is still unclear, and more research on these programs is needed.

Patient-Centered Medical Home Measurement in School-Based Health Centers.

School-based health centers (SBHCs) have been suggested as potential medical homes, yet minimal attention has been paid to measuring their patient-centered medical home (PCMH) implementation. The purposes of this article were to (1) develop an index to measure PCMH attributes in SBHCs, (2) use the SBHC PCMH Index to compare PCMH capacity between PCMH certified and non-PCMH SBHCs, and (3) examine differences in index scores between SBHCs based in schools with and without adolescents. A total of six PCMH dimensions in the SBHC PCMH Index were identified through factor analysis. These dimensions were collapsed into two domains: care quality and comprehensive care. SBHCs recognized as PCMHs had higher scores on the index, both domains, and four dimensions. SBHCs based in schools with just young children and those with adolescents scored similarly on the overall index, but analysis of individual index items shows their strengths and weaknesses in PCMH implementation.

Correlates of Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition in School-Based Health Centers.

BACKGROUND: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is promoted as a way to improve access to care, health care outcomes, and control costs. The organizational, environmental, and patient characteristics associated with school-based health centers (SBHCs) obtaining PCMH recognition is currently unknown. A multitheoretical approach was used to explore the correlates of formal PCMH recognition in SBHCs. METHODS: The 2013-2014 National Census of School-Based Health Centers was used as the primary data source for this analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the odds of an SBHC obtaining any type of PCMH recognition, and obtaining national PCMH recognition. RESULTS: Only 29% of SBHCs had received any type of recognition as a PCMH and 17% reported receiving national-level recognition. School-based health centers that were managed care preferred providers, received Health Resources and Services Administration SBHC Capital Funding, and based in schools without adolescents had greater odds of both types of PCMH recognition outcomes. High levels of revenue from patient billing and more staff were also associated with national PCMH recognition. CONCLUSIONS: Financial and personnel resources are needed for national-level PCMH recognition, and managed care is supportive of PCMH implementation. Efforts should be made to increase medical home activity in SBHCs that serve adolescents.

Longitudinal Evaluation of Quality Improvement and Public Health Accreditation Readiness in Nebraska Local Health Departments, 2011-2016.

OBJECTIVES: Public health accreditation is intended to improve the performance of public health departments, and quality improvement (QI) is an important component of the Public Health Accreditation Board process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the QI maturity and accreditation readiness of local health departments (LHDs) in Nebraska during a 6-year period that included several statewide initiatives to progress readiness, including funding and technical assistance. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach that consisted of both online surveys and key informant interviews to assess QI maturity and accreditation readiness. Nineteen of Nebraska's 21 LHDs completed the survey in 2011 and 2013, 20 of 20 LHDs completed the survey in 2015, and 19 of 20 LHDs completed the survey in 2016. We facilitated a large group discussion with staff members from 16 LHDs in 2011, and we conducted key informant interviews with staff members from 4 LHDs in 2015. RESULTS: Both QI maturity and accreditation readiness improved from 2011 to 2016. In 2011, of 19 LHDs, only 6 LHD directors agreed that their LHD had a culture that focused on QI, but this number increased every year up to 12 in 2016. The number of LHDs that had a high capacity to engage in QI efforts improved from 3 in 2011 to 8 in 2016. The number of LHDs with a QI plan increased from 3 in 2011 to 10 in 2016. The number of LHDs that were confident in their ability to obtain Public Health Accreditation Board accreditation improved from 6 in 2011 to 13 in 2016. Although their QI maturity generally increased over time, LHDs interviewed in 2015 still faced challenges adopting a formal QI system. External financial and technical support helped LHDs build their QI maturity and accreditation readiness. CONCLUSION: Funding and technical assistance can improve LHDs' QI maturity and accreditation readiness. Improvement takes time and sustained efforts by LHDs, and support from external partners (eg, state health departments) helps build LHDs' QI maturity and accreditation readiness.

Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening for Patients of Rural Accountable Care Organization Clinics: A Multilevel Analysis.

PURPOSE: This study examines multilevel factors related to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in a rural Accountable Care Organization (ACO) setting. METHODS: The study used electronic medical record data from 8 rural ACO clinics in Nebraska. The final sample included 15,866 average-risk patients aged 50-75 years who visited participating clinics at least once from June 2014 to May 2015. Logistic regression was conducted to examine simultaneous effects of patient, provider, and county characteristics on CRC screening after accounting for provider-county-level correlation using a generalized estimating equations method. FINDINGS: The results indicated that patients aged 65 years and older, non-Hispanic white, whose preferred language was English, who had insurance, who had a wellness visit in the past year, and who had chronic conditions were more likely to be up-to-date on CRC screening. Patients were also more likely to be up-to-date when their primary care provider was a female medical doctor who was aware of clinic CRC screening protocols or who manually checked patient CRC screening status during the patient visit. Patients in a county with no gastroenterologist, a high poverty rate, and low insurance coverage were less likely to be up-to-date on CRC screening. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of patient, provider, and county characteristics were associated with CRC screening. Effective strategies to promote CRC screening should address multilevel factors, including: targeting patients with identified individual barriers, modifying physician and clinical practices, and focusing on communities with low socioeconomic status or low levels of medical resources.

Breast Cancer Screening for Patients of Rural Accountable Care Organization Clinics: A Multi-Level Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators.

Not all women 50-74 years received biennial mammography and the situation is worse in rural areas. Accountable care organizations (ACO) emphasize coordinated care, use of electronic health system, and preventive quality measures and these practices may improve their patients' breast cancer screening rate. Using medical record data of 8,347 women patients aged 50-74 years from eight rural ACO clinics in Nebraska, this study examined patient-, provider-, and county-level barriers and facilitators for breast cancer screening. A generalized estimating equations model was used to account for the correlation among patients from the same provider and county. The multi-level logistic regression results suggest that uninsured non-Hispanic Black patients were less likely to meet the biennial mammography screening guideline. Patients whose preferred language being English, having a preventive visit in the past 12 months, having one or more chronic conditions were more likely to meet the biennial mammography screening guideline. Patients with a primary care provider (PCP) that was male, without a medical doctor degree were less likely to screen biennially. Patients with a PCP that reviewed performance report quarterly, or manually checked patients' mammography screening status during visits were more likely to screen biennially. Interestingly, patients whose PCP reported being reminded by a care coordination team were less likely to screen biennially. Patients living in counties with more PCPs were also more likely to screen biennially. The study findings suggest that efforts targeting individual and practice-level barriers could be most effective in improving mammography screening for these rural ACO patients.

Measuring the Cost and Value of Quality Improvement Initiatives for Local Health Departments.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate an approach to measuring the cost and value of quality improvement (QI) implementation in local health departments (LHDs). DESIGN: We conducted cost estimation for 4 LHD QI projects and return-on-investment (ROI) analysis for 2 selected LHD QI projects. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Four Nebraska LHDs varying in rurality and jurisdiction size. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs, unit costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and ROI. RESULTS: The 4 QI projects vary significantly in their cost estimates. Estimated ROI ratios for 2 QI projects predicted significant savings in health care utilization for respective program participants. A QI project focused on improving breastfeeding rates in WIC (women, infants, and children) clients had a predicted ROI ratio of 3230% and a QI project for improving participation in a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program would need only 34 new participants to have a positive ROI. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated how data can be collected and analyzed for cost estimation and ROI analysis to quantify the economic value of QI for LHDs. Our ROI analysis shows that QI initiatives have great potential to enhance the value of LHDs' public health services. A better understanding of the costs and value of QI will enable LHDs to appropriately allocate and utilize their limited resources for suitable QI initiatives.

Rurality, Quality Improvement Maturity, and Accreditation Readiness: A Comparison Study of Colorado, Kansas, and Nebraska Local Health Departments.

OBJECTIVE: To compare local health department (LHD) accreditation readiness (AR) and quality improvement (QI) maturity in 3 states, between LHDs with varying levels of rurality, and across an LHD staffing-level continuum. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional comparative study that included an online survey administered to LHD directors in Colorado, Kansas, and Nebraska. The survey included 10 questions assessed on a 5-point Likert scale covering 3 QI domains and 13 questions covering 5 AR domains. The median score for both QI maturity and AR was calculated by each state, by the number of full-time equivalent staff employed at the LHD, and by a measure of rurality and population density. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 156 LHDs from the states of Colorado, Kansas, and Nebraska. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): QI maturity and AR scores. RESULTS: A majority (59%) of the surveyed LHDs plan to apply or have already applied for Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) accreditation. The overall QI maturity and AR scores were highest in Nebraska, as was the intent to seek PHAB accreditation and current use of PHAB standards. Across levels of rurality and staffing, LHD QI maturity scores were similar; however, AR scores improved as LHD staffing levels increased and rurality decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Small LHDs and rural LHDs have QI maturity levels that are comparable to larger, less rural LHDs, but their AR is much lower. As accreditation has been found to have positive benefits, it is important that all LHDs have the capacity and resources to meet the performance standards required of accredited LHDs. Small, rural LHDs may need additional resources and support in order to improve their ability to be accredited and/or certain accreditation requirements may need modification to make accreditation more accessible to small LHDs.